| 
		
		Bristol F2B FighterFlying the Brisfit
 
		
		by Dave Lochead 
		  
			
				
					| 
					 |  
					| Bristol F2B 
					Fighter |  
  Roden's 1/48 scale F2B Fighter is available online 
		from Squadron.com
     Ever wondered what flying a WWI aircraft is like?
 This is not a build review of Roden's 1/48 Bristol Fighter kit, as there 
		are plenty of those around already. Suffice to say that the Roden kit is 
		beautifully made, a challenge to build, and frustrating to rig… You have 
		been warned.
 Six photographs of my 1/48 scale Roden Brisfit kit may be seen below. Rather, this is an article about what its like to fly the Brisfit, 
		and my experiences with it. The aircraft I flew was the replica built in 
		the USA by Ed and Pete Storro, who are currently building a replica 
		Bristol Bulldog, and now owned and operated by the Omaka fighter 
		collection.   
		 Click on the thumbnails 
        below to view larger images of Roden's 1/48 scale Brisfit:[../../photogallery/photo00032016/real.htm] 
   Flying the Brisfit I have to admit to having very little experience with powered 
		aircraft, my flying has almost exclusively been of the silent type, 
		Gliders, radio control sailplanes and latterly paragliding, of which I 
		have managed to amass over 1000 hours experience with no personal 
		injury, until recently that is. Some time in a Tiger Moth helped prepare 
		me for what was coming, but not by much.
 So while flying is not new to me, being let loose with someone else’s 
		treasured Great War aircraft was slightly unexpected.
 
 Externally, the replica looks exactly as per the original, however, 
		internally things are a little different. The Bristol has a welded steel 
		fuselage instead of the wood, wire and fishplates maze of the originals, 
		and is fitted with a more modern, but still old, inline six cylinder 
		Ranger engine and smaller diameter propeller. This is due to the 
		scarcity of the original V-12 rolls Royce engines. The fitting of modern 
		engines in WW1 airframes can cause some problems, more of which later
 
 The first impression of the Bristol as you approach it is that its 
		actually a reasonably large aircraft. Building models of these machines 
		doesn’t prepare you for the first impression you get of the real thing. 
		I remember thinking how small a Spitfire was when I first saw one, and 
		how the larger than life legend that surrounds it made me think the 
		aircraft would somehow be larger that it was in reality. The Bristol on 
		the other hand, I thought would be small and delicate, just like the 
		Airfix kit of days gone by.
 
 Prior to flying, a walk around and pre-flight inspection is carried out, 
		starting at the nose, checking that no birds have snuck in to the 
		cowling and nested in there.. I’ve never heard of it happening, but I 
		guess you cant be too sure. Check the prop for splitting, and while we 
		are here, turn the engine over by the prop about 10 times to get some 
		oil flowing, naturally before this is carried out, check the Magneto 
		switches are in the OFF position, embarrassing and messy accidents are 
		best avoided.
 
 Working our way around the aircraft we come to the ailerons, having 
		first inspected all struts and fittings for any damage.
 
 It is at this stage I notice two things that do not bode well for the 
		handling characteristics of this aircraft. Firstly there is no aileron 
		differential, the effect of the aileron moving further in the up 
		position than the down, and countering adverse yaw, where the aircraft 
		rolls one way, and yaws the other due to aileron drag.
 
 Secondly, the aileron gap isn’t sealed. This may not sound like much, 
		but when the airflow reaches the aileron gap, it breaks away and reduces 
		the effectiveness of the control. I had learnt this lesson the hard way 
		with radio controlled gliders, and how the roll rate improved when the 
		aileron gaps were sealed, needless to say I stored this in the back of 
		my mind to allow for a slower roll rate than the Tiger.
 
 Making our way to the tail area, there are a lot of exposed control 
		cables to be checked, especially the elevator cables, which cross over 
		each other and have leather boots to stop them chafing. These cables are 
		checked very carefully.
   
		 
 The rudder looks impossibly small for the wing span of the aircraft, and 
		I am starting to realise just how little was known about aerodynamics 
		and control coupling at the dawn of the warplane. Around to the cockpit, 
		and we climb up to check all is well. Entering the Bristol is awkward at 
		best, climbing up over an exhaust pipe. Thankfully cold at this stage, 
		but not for long, the elevator cables, the scarf ring for the gun in the 
		rear cockpit, and arranging the straps so you can reach them when 
		seated.
 
 The only thing to check in the rear cockpit is that the second stick is 
		fitted, and firmly bolted, and a visual inspection for anything out of 
		the ordinary. There are no instruments back here, something else I am 
		going to have to deal with.
 
 Now firmly seated in the cockpit, Tim Sullivan, the Pilot in charge 
		tells me that we will need to warm the engine, which is quite cold 
		blooded, and will need 10 minutes of fast idle.
 
 I’m not briefed on any of the checklists for the aircraft, but in this 
		instance ,its pretty straightforward, cowl shutters closed, throttle 
		set, stick well back. A couple of turns on the electric starter, a 
		luxury that WW1 ground crew can only have dreamed of, and the Ranger 
		springs into life.
 
 The engine is surprisingly quiet, but there is a reasonable amount of 
		wind buffet, especially in the rear seat, where there is no protection, 
		and the fabric fuselage sides are drumming from the airflow.
 
 Tim climbs out and leaves me sitting in the aircraft as it warms up, I 
		realise after a little while that 10 minutes holding the elevator in the 
		full up position is getting pretty tiring, and the throttle friction 
		isn’t set, so the throttle creeps closed and needs to be adjusted 
		regularly with the other hand, so a lot of hand swapping is going on to 
		deal with the fatigue and the throttle problem.
 
 Eventually Tim returns and climbs into the front cockpit, he takes the 
		stick while I throw his shoulder straps forward, then I take the stick 
		again as he gets buckled up and comfortable. Comfortable is something 
		I’m not, as for some reason the rear seat cushion has been overlooked in 
		all of this operation, and ive been sitting on the hard wood seat pan 
		with the vibration travelling through my buttocks, and my arms hurt, I 
		suspect this is some form of initiation ceremony, as Tim is jovially 
		chatting away unaware of my suffering.
 
 Tim calls for chocks away, opens the radiator shutters, and we throttle 
		up to taxi to the active runway. Unfortunately this is some distance to 
		taxi, and the airfield is quite rough, my behind is numb at this point, 
		and I am looking forward to getting the experience either underway or 
		over.
 
 Holding at the threshold we scan the air for aircraft on approach. No 
		Fokkers are in the circuit, so we are safe to take off.
 
 Giving the Bristol full throttle we move down the grass strip at a very 
		leisurely pace, and stagger in to the air. Stagger seems the right 
		description as the poor old Ranger fights to overcome all the drag that 
		a two bay biplane can muster.
 
 The climb out feels to me very much like the aircraft is on the verge of 
		stalling, I know Tim knows the aircraft well, but gaining altitude seems 
		to be a struggle. The original aircraft was blessed with a more 
		effective engine and prop combination, swinging a far bigger prop at 
		lower revolutions and with more pitch. This is the unfortunate trade off 
		that comes from using a modern engine and prop, which run at higher 
		revolutions. The original Brisfit should have a better climb rate.
 
 Having climbed eventually to the heady altitude of 2000 feet, Tim puts 
		the old girl through a couple of stalls, and dives to gain some airspeed 
		before performing a mild chandelle.
 
 The Bristol is quite maneuverable in the hands of a skilled pilot, and 
		can easily turn inside a Fokker Triplane as the Tripe pilots regularly 
		get shown.
 
 There is no way that Tim and I can communicate over the din and 
		shrieking wind, so hand signals are the order of the day, unfortunately 
		I haven’t been briefed on them, or much else, and when Tim wriggles the 
		stick, indication I’m to take control, I suddenly realise I have been 
		thrown very much in the deep end, and left to sink or swim.
 
 The instant I grab the stick I realise the aircraft feels like it is 
		teetering, and not necessarily at the centre of gravity. The sensation 
		is like trying to walk on slippery gravel, and much care and attention 
		is needed even to keep a straight and level attitude.
 
 Since I have no instruments, I can only guess at the airspeed, and where 
		the stall point may be. If the Bristol is flown one wing low then there 
		is a tendency to yaw away from the low wing, and once this has started 
		happening you get a firm reminder in the form of a severe buffet to the 
		side of the head as the aircraft slips. Looking out through the struts 
		and wires I get the impression, largely due to the forward stagger of 
		the struts, that we are flying in a nose down attitude. I mistakenly 
		correct this, and then proceed to perform some turns.
 
 As I expected, the roll rate was very slow, and the ailerons very 
		ineffective. The adverse yaw is much more than I had experienced before 
		in a glider, and the small rudder meant I was having trouble correcting 
		it. Tim indicates with his left hand to bury my foot deeply on the left 
		rudder pedal, but its not that easy, as since I don’t have the cushions 
		in place, I cant get full rudder command and we are lurching about the 
		sky.
 
 I slide myself down through the harness straps and off the edge of the 
		seat, this feels ridiculous, and I am hoping no one on the ground from 
		the Omaka Fighter Collection is watching my progress and mistaking it 
		for ham fisted flying.
 
 However, as if that wasn’t bad enough, I was just about to demonstrate 
		how ham fisted I could get as the aircraft was just above stall speed 
		going into the next turn, which was reasonably steep.
 
 I am still on the edge of the seat, not quite prone trying to deal with 
		the rudder pedal movement, when the poor old girl decides she has had 
		enough and stalls. The effect of stalling in a turn is for all intents 
		and purposes a spin entry, and the Bristol gently drops its wing and its 
		nose follows as it seeks out more airspeed.
 
 Luckily my gliding instructor had trained me well in spin recovery, and 
		the Brisfit felt just like a glider as it entered, I centralised the 
		stick, with the intention of letting the speed build up a little before 
		applying opposite rudder and flying out of the situation, figuring that 
		the extra airspeed would prevent a tip stall upon applying any aileron, 
		and the increased airflow would make the controls more effective.
 
 Of course Tim, in the front cockpit , not knowing what was going through 
		my mind, instantly took the controls and corrected the problem before I 
		could.
 
 Feeling suitably shamed, and realising that the margin between flying 
		speed and the stall was extremely slight, all the turns following this 
		experience were at low bank angles and slightly nose down to keep above 
		the stall speed.
 
 Tim remarked to me afterwards that the return flight to the airfield was 
		very sedate, and had I got a fright? No, I hadn’t got a fright as such, 
		its just that I was more wary of putting the aircraft in that position 
		again. The turn in the spin entry was little over 90 degrees, but I had 
		no desire to see what life would be like beyond that point.
 
 We return to Omaka, and the rest of the flight is incident free, I 
		notice that when the Bristol is about to land, almost in ground effect, 
		it starts to behave in a nicer manner, but I have no explanation for why 
		this should be the case.
 
 We taxi back to the hanger, and shut down, climbing out, I expect some 
		abuse from Tim about my performance but in typical fashion he laughs it 
		off, and I offer an explanation for how I was going to effect the spin 
		recovery. We compare notes, but I feel the aircraft has got the better 
		of me, and I comment that perhaps the OFC should experiment with sealing 
		the aileron gaps to improve the handling.
 
 Then I speak with other members of the collection, and learn I have the 
		dubious privilege of being the only person to spin the aircraft, even 
		though I would not have described it as a spin myself.
 
 The lesson was learned however, and the next time I meet the Brisfit, I 
		notice that the aileron gaps have been sealed, and I am told it handles 
		much better. But more tellingly, the rear control stick had been 
		removed, and never again would the Bristol be used to test a new pilots 
		skills, or lack of..
 
 Did I enjoy my experience flying the aircraft ?
 To be honest, no, I didn’t enjoy it at all, but it gave me a new 
		found respect and interest in those pioneering WWI pilots who did fly 
		it. What I do have however is a very unique entry in the 8th flight of 
		my powered flying log book.. “Bristol F2B, spin entry and recovery” and 
		I am not too proud of that either.
 Later I would re acquaint myself in spectacular fashion with the Bristol 
		fighter, but this time I would be mounted on a Brough Superior 
		motorcycle.
   
		 
 But that’s another story…
 
 
 Text and Images Copyright 
		2007 by Dave LocheadPage Created 01 March, 2007
 Last Updated
        24 December, 2007
Back to
        HyperScale Main Page |