Modelling
and Painting
Hetzer Variants
by Neville Lord
Dragon/DML Hetzer Boxart |
I d e n t i f y i n g H e t z e r V a r i a n t s |
The Hetzer was a late WWII German light tank destroyer based on the chassis of the Czech
Skoda 38t tank. This design was also operated with very few modifications by the Swiss and
Czechoslovak postwar armies.
Until last year there was no single comprehensive English language reference available on the Hetzer. Most early references (e.g. Encyclopedia of WWII German Tanks) only consider two production versions of the Hetzer (early and late) and several limited production variants (e.g. flame-thrower & recovery vehicle). DML/Dragons release of a "mid" had confused me. I now hope to clarify the matter.
In the "Leichte Jagdpanzer" German language book by Spielberger there are five sets of line drawings for production Hetzer. These depict the changes introduced over time and how vehicles made by Skoda differed from those made by BMM another Czech firm:
In summary, Dragon have released the early, mid and late Hetzers as made by BMM.
New Connection makes several resin conversions for the Hetzer including the Starr prototype which had a rigid mounted gun. Eduard and Show Modelling both offer etched metal sets which include the perforated tool box, improved exhaust muffler, MG shield and other enhancements. The Eduard set is designed for the older Italeri Hetzer kit.
Dragons Early Hetzer can only be built as a May to June version. The command kit is a September version as described above with a crows foot aerial. In reality it is the early Hetzer kit, less the etched metal exhaust sheaf, but with improved road wheels and many (not all) late style parts included, plus a bonus set of 5 crew men. This kit is quite flexible as to version.
The late Hetzer (kit 6040) is typical of Hetzers used in the Ardennes and the final defence of Germany. This kit offers a Flammpanzer option. It may only be built as a BMM Hetzer produced after October 1944.
The 20 Flammpanzers were used in the Ardennes Offensive and several captured vehicles were well photographed. Neither of the photographed vehicles Ive seen had the combination of exhaust, toolbox and rear idler as represented in the Dragon kit. However some probably did.
B u i l d i n g t h e D r a g o n / D M L H e t z e r s |
The three Hetzer kits were amongst Dragon's first to receive praise for their high
quality.
The Hetzer kits fit well and are accurate in both outline and most small details. However caution is required at times, as they are not particularly forgiving. Separate link tracks are provided, as is a fret of etched metal. During assembly I noticed that two sprues were mis-moulded resulting in considerable loss of detail on the drive sprockets and return idler.
Construction Tips - CAUTION
Enhancement & Correction
H e t z e r C a m o u f l a g e |
The paint scheme applied to Hetzers changed over time and much controversy exists over the
colours applied from September 1944 onwards. Photos of Hetzers are limited because most
German photos taken in late 1944 were destroyed in 1945. Newer books that access Czech and
German sources are throwing more light on the subject. As far as I can I can tell Skoda
and BMM did not apply the same camouflage patterns at the same time.
There is no dispute that up to August 1944 Hetzers were painted yellow in the factory and any camouflage paint was applied in the field.
September saw the introduction of the "ambush" scheme being applied in the factory as per official policy. This was a hard-edged mix of yellow/green/brown in even ratio with contrasting dots. The assembled kit on the side of the Command version box is painted as per the factory photos. In November the official policy saw primer red being used as the base colour with hard edged camouflage. This was quite likely done judging by monochrome BMM factory photos. Close examination of photos revealed these Hetzers factory hard edged camouflage markings were applied using three patterns:
From about November 1944 the hotly debated "Hetzer" scheme(s) emerged. This is a base colour with thin brush painted vertical camouflage stripes. There are three schools of thought on this scheme:
I support that the second view was used view based on the quality of research behind it, that Czech green is close to the official German policy in December of a dark green base, and examination of photos. The clues to examining photos are that the black stripes under the visors and tyres are noticeably darker than the rest of the paint scheme (hence its unlikely black was a camouflage colour) and that the green paint luster is of a final coat in a light colour.
I am unsure on the extent the third scheme was used. I personally havent seen the cited photo, and am looking forward to seeing some more evidence, especially concerning whether or not it was factory applied.
C o n c l u s i o n |
Dragons Hetzer range are all excellent kits, which can be made into superb models
out of the box. Several small points can be improved on fairly easily. Current references
provide the modeller the choice of some quite interesting and complex schemes.
Contradictory advice may make you check your colours twice. Whichever scheme you choose,
enjoy it!
R e f e r e n c e s |
"Leichte Jagdpanzer" by Walter Spielberger (German Language),
"Czechoslovak Armoured Fighting Vehicles 1918-1948" by Charles Kliment
"Flammpanzer" Osprey New Vanguard No 15
"MMiR" Fall 1997 vol 14.
Footnote: On the red/yellow/white scheme a good way to form your own opinion is to compare the Jagdpanther plates in Panther Variants to that on p 38 of Schiffers Jagdpanzers by H. Scheibert. Both are Nov 1944 MNH vehicles used in the Ardennes with identical features (e.g. relocated vent on roof, early grille, late barrel).
Article Text by Neville Lord
Visit Track-Link for the best of
Armour Modelling.
Page Created 20 June 1998
Last updated 26 July 2007
Back to HyperScale Main Page
Back to Feature Articles